Monday, November 13, 2006

Prisoners' payout for cold turkey in jail

The Government has been forced to settle out of court and pay compensation to prisoners who were forced off heroin, and had to undergo cold turkey in prison. The prisoners had claimed that this amounted to 'assault' and a breach of their human rights.

My first reaction on hearing the news was one of incredulity. However, after considering the facts, I think the Government was right to settle the case, at least in the case of any prisoners who were already undergoing treatment before incarceration.

If we are to take the view (which many do) that drug addiction is an illness, the Government should have ensured that the prisoners continued to receive 'treatment' after they were locked up. In just the same way as someone being treated under the NHS would continue to receive treatment in jail, the appropriate authorities should have ensured that treatment continued in prison.

There is, of course, the argument that 'cold turkey' could be considered a form of treatment, albeit not the one that the prisoners were undergoing before being jailed. The Government could have argued that it was not up to the prisoners to choose which method of treatment they received; ie continued methadone versus cold turkey. This argument would have been bound to fail, however, as it would probably have been impossible to show that cold turkey treatment was given as a deliberate, coherent and informed strategy. Chances are that the prisoners were just thrown into jail, and that was that.

I am not against cold turkey per se, and in future, the Government may well win such a case on similar facts, if they can show that that was the most suitable treatment available, taking into account all the circumstances of the case.

Getting people to come off drugs is a Good Thing, not only for the addicts, but for society as a whole. For one thing, the crime rate would come tumbling down, as many who commit crime to fund their habits would do so no longer. If we are to be serious about the drugs problem, we need to adopt proper methods for detoxifying drug addicts, whether in or out of jail. If a drug addict who is receiving treatment is sent to jail and the treatment is discontinued, this is of no advantage to anyone. For one thing, the investment in his treatment up to that point will have been wasted. I suppose what today's news should highlight is the need for prison authorities to ensure that convicts already undergoing treatment be allowed to continue receiving such treatment. By all means, impose cold turkey in future, but let this be the result of a properly thought-out drugs policy. What a prison authority must never do is deny basic health care to its inmates.

UPDATE. Every blog I read on this topic yesterday was of a contrary view to mine (see, for example, Ellee Seymour, West Brom Blog and The Thunder Dragon). I hadn't seen Tim Worstall's post, which argued on broadly the same lines as mine. He states (in my view, rightly) that it is not altogether unreasonable to expect the Home Office to take responsibility for the standard of medical care received by prisoners in their care. It really is not about the heroin at all. It is about treatment.
You are viewing a post on Bel's old site. Click here to find this post on the new site.

|

5 Comments:

Anonymous Ellee said...

Great minds Bel, I couldn't resist writing up on this. You couldn't make up such incompetence could you? Our prisoners are so precious that their cravings for hard, illegal drugs comes before any rehabiltative programme. So instead, they get thousands of pounds to spend on more drugs. This is such a crazy Government, I don't know how they will talk their way out of it.

7:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I appreciate the thoughtful post. Well done resisting the obvious knee-jerk reaction to this story.

But I don't accept that it is our obligation to provide this healthcare of choice to the prisoners. There extreme discomfort of cold turkey is the consequence of their addiction, not the fault of others who do not support treatment or continued drug use.

Since human rights are defined by our European masters, you are probably right from a legal point of view. But morally, we seem to have ended up in a topsy turvy situation where the criminal sues the public. This is because the definition of human rights has been so twisted... as I blogged.

And, hey... thanks for the very encouraging comments. I'm enjoying your blog too.

11:43 AM  
Anonymous Ellee said...

Yes, there is no doubt that this whole issue about treating drug addicts needs sorting out. But what about if they don't want to be helped? I'm sure "cold turkey" must be very unplesant, but these prisoners are not in there to have a soft ride.

Btw, there is room for one less criminal today as a council tax protesting pensioner has been given a cell instead of a criminal.

12:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree that the Home Office is responsible for the health care of it's prisoners, but the taxpayer should not have to pay for them to be able to maintain a drug habit, of any form. Cold turkey is a form of treatment, whether or not it was deliberate.

What annoys me most is that now the criminals are to get compensation for it! If it was simply fopr the right to choose their treatment for drug addiction, I would accept it at least to a certain degree.

12:32 AM  
Blogger Rehabcourse said...

I recently published an article on drug rehab – here is a quote from it, in case you are interested:

Here are some alternatives you should think of:
Free standing inpatient drug rehab program – short term program for less severe addictions;
Inpatient drug rehab program – rehabilitation unit – for severe mental and physical disabilities;
Inpatient drug rehab program – detoxification unit – in general this program takes place on an outpatient basis, but sometimes withdrawal from either drugs or alcohol presupposes extreme measures to prevent relapse. It is important to help patients to change their old habits, and this may happen only through a longer-term disruption from the environment where everything remembers them of the urge to return to the substance of their addiction;
Long term residential drug rehab program – is important for those who would relapse easily (youth, chronic addicts, patients with more than one diagnosis etc.).

If you feel this helps, please drop by my website for additional information, such as drug addiction rehab information or additional resources on free drug rehab .

Regards,

Mike R.

4:34 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home